#############################################
# /!\ AUTO GENERATED FILE - DO NOT EDIT /!\ #
#############################################


2;"How would you rate their performance over the last time period? ";"- Above expectations: objectives have been exceeded, peer feedback is unanimous and full mastery of skills is demonstrated.\n - Meeting expectations: objectives have been met, peer feedback is positive and the skills required for the job are mastered or being learned. \n - Below expectations: objectives have not been met, peer feedback highlights areas for development and key competencies require improvement. This performance requires immediate attention and corrective action. ";2;3;true;false;"Above expectations";null;"Meeting expectations";null;"Below expectations ";null
2;"What potential do they have within the organisation? ";"- High potential: demonstrates exceptional ability to progress and occupy increasingly strategic positions. \n- Satisfactory potential: has the ability to progress at a normal pace, depending on opportunities and personal development. \n- Limited potential: little evidence of ability to progress beyond current position without significant development. ";2;3;true;false;"High potential ";null;"Satisfactory potential";null;"Limited potential ";null
2;"How would you rate their level of commitment to the organisation? ";"- Strong commitment: shows enthusiasm and constant involvement that often exceeds expectations. \n - Moderate commitment: involved to a satisfactory extent, sometimes lacking motivation or proactivity.\n - Weak commitment: does the minimum required, shows a lack of interest in the company's tasks or objectives. ";2;3;true;false;"Strong commitment";null;"Moderate commitment ";null;"Weak commitment ";null
2;"How likely would you say it is that the employee will leave the organisation within a few months?";"- High risk: shows clear signs of disengagement or has explicitly expressed intentions to leave. \n - Moderate risk: shows some signs that could indicate a risk of departure, but not definitively. \n- Low risk: seems satisfied and stable in their current role, with few signs of an imminent departure. ";2;3;true;false;"High risk";null;"Moderate risk";null;" Low risk ";null
2;"What impact would their departure have on the team and the organisation?";"High impact: their departure would have a significant impact on the organisation or the way the team operates, and they would be difficult to replace.\n- Moderate impact: their departure would require adjustments but could be managed without seriously disrupting operations.\n - Low impact: their departure would have minimal impact and the transition would be easy to manage. ";2;3;true;false;"High impact ";null;"Moderate impact ";null;"Low impact";null
2;"What kind of career development do you propose for the employee? ";"In the comments, please specify the target role in cases of in-house mobility. ";2;3;true;false;"Promotion ";null;"Functional mobility";null;"No change ";null